Are You a Problem Collector or a Problem Solver?

Our approach to problem solving is closely tied to our self-concepts as Type A overachievers, and how we express that identity to our co-workers, bosses, and clients.

The Problem Collector

If you define “overachievement” by how hard you work, how chronically overwhelmed you are, and the amount of stress you can endure, then you’re more likely to be a problem collector.

The problem collector’s motto is, “I outwork everyone.” They always seem to be racing from one Zoom meeting to the next, tend to say yes to every request, and typically have more on their plate than anyone could reasonably be expected to handle on their own.

The Problem Solver

If you define “overachievement” by impact rather than busyness or stress, then you’re more likely to be a problem solver. You’re not that concerned with effort for effort’s sake, but with focusing your finite time and energy on the problems that will have the greatest effect on the goals that matter most.

The problem solver’s motto is, “I focus on the right problem at the right time.” They’re not that worried about impressing others by how hard they grind or how many hours they happen to work. In fact, the more effortlessly they can achieve the greatest impact, the better. They focus their attention on the problems that really matter, and set strong (but reasonable) boundaries to protect their time and energy.

Shifting from Collecting Problems to Solving the Right Problems

The good news is that becoming a problem solver instead of a problem collector doesn’t mean giving up your self-concept as a Type-A achiever. All it takes is:

  • A slight shift in perspective and the willingness to rethink your definition of “achievement.”
  • Being less concerned with looking busy and other external but misleading signals of productivity.
  • Trusting that others will still recognize and appreciate your contribution, even if you make it look easy.

What will you do today to stop collecting more problems, and instead focus on solving the right problems?

Will you reconsider how you define productivity and your own inherent value?

Leave a comment